<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FilmmakerIQ.com &#187; Selling Your Film</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmmakeriq.com/category/distribution/selling-your-film/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmmakeriq.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Finding Real Numbers in Imaginary Movies</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2012/01/finding-real-numbers-in-imaginary-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2012/01/finding-real-numbers-in-imaginary-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John P. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribtuion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=10717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting a filmmaker to divulge the exact cost of a film is next to impossible. The same goes for distributors when asked about what kind of numbers to expect on the sales end. So at "Distribution X" at Sundance, a panel of distributors were asked to give numbers on wholly imaginary movies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting a filmmaker to divulge the exact cost of a film is next to impossible. The same goes for distributors when asked about what kind of numbers to expect on the sales end. So at &#8220;Distribution X&#8221; at Sundance, a panel of distributors were asked to give numbers on wholly imaginary movies.</p>
<blockquote><p><a  href="http://www.indiewire.com/article/real-numbers-from-imaginary-movies-the-distribution-x-panel-at-sundance-2012">Case study #1: Documentary, pitched by Senain Kheshgi<br />
This documentary is about the case of the 10 Muslim student alliance kids at U.C. Irvine who protested/heckled the Israeli Ambassador at a speech in 2010 and were charged with federal offenses.</p>
<p>Budget: $575,000 (about half equity, the rest non-repayable grants and foundations).<br />
Needs: About $100,000 to finish film.<br />
Distribution: Has a $45,000 deal from TV broadcaster&#8230; who also wants first right of refusal on VOD/digital distribution. Unclear whether those are subscription VOD rights or ad-supported VOD rights, or if they can be negotiated.<br />
Status: The film is in rough cut.</p>
<p>Josh Braun<br />
Giving up TV rights too soon for too little money in the US is not advisable A 52-minute TV-version is key; without it, you lose opportunities. Selling for $45,000 and not carving our key digits rights is a bad idea, as it severely limits sales potential and theatrical investment. You can do multiple subscription VOD deals, so as the lines blur between TV and Internet platforms, it will likely be harder to carve out rights. The key to preselling TV is that the sale should amount to at least 50% of the budget.</a></p>
<p><strong> Indiewire.com | <a  href="http://www.indiewire.com/article/real-numbers-from-imaginary-movies-the-distribution-x-panel-at-sundance-2012">Read the Full Article</a></strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2012/01/finding-real-numbers-in-imaginary-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Helping Newt &#8220;Rebuild the America We Love&#8221; for $64 in Royalties</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/12/helping-newt-rebuild-the-america-we-love-for-only-64/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/12/helping-newt-rebuild-the-america-we-love-for-only-64/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John P. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=10243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I woke up today it was morning in America, but it wasn't until the afternoon before I realized I helped create the dawn. That's when I saw Newt Gingrich's "Rebuilding the America We Love" ad and noticed those images that all political pundits where dissecting where in part created by me. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a  href="http://filmmakeriq.com/members/Gospel_John/">by John Hess</a></em></p>
<p>When I woke up today it was morning in America, but it wasn&#8217;t until the afternoon before I realized I helped create the dawn. That&#8217;s when I saw Newt Gingrich&#8217;s &#8220;Rebuilding the America We Love&#8221; ad and noticed those images that all political pundits where dissecting where in part created by me. </p>
<p>Turns out Newt used part of his <a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fnewt-gingrich-releases-first-tv-ad-on-the-america-we-love%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNHkwlliP03cp1ScSRSjHeoK5Vv12A">Tiffany-esque $250,000 ad budget</a> to pay me $64 in royalties for the right to use one of <a  href="http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-video-12862761-american-afternoon.php">my Stock Videos</a> as a main component in his spot that some are calling &#8220;<a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.esquire.com%2Fblogs%2Fpolitics%2Fnewt-gingrich-iowa-ad-6610653&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNH7KNK4t-x-W5QG8bwnYhd2wo_oTQ">Morning in America 2.0</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now my work is being compared to everyone one from <a  href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stewart-j-lawrence/newt-gingrich-iowa_b_1130817.html">David Lynch</a> to <a  href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69766.html">Michael Bay</a>. I hope that isn&#8217;t what they consider &#8220;fair and balanced.&#8221;</p>
<p>You may remember this image I posted in a review of the <a  href="http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/04/sony-hdr-ax2000-an-iq-exclusive-review/">Sony AX2000</a> back in April of 2010.</p>
<p><a  href="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/AX2000-Review_806.jpg" class="thickbox no_icon" rel="gallery-10243" title=""><img src="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/AX2000-Review_806-1024x576.jpg" alt="" title="AX2000-Review_806" width="600" height="337" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1909" /></a></p>
<p>Ignoring the bizarre lighting on Newt&#8217;s talking-head shot (looks like he&#8217;s trying out for &#8220;Best Tan&#8221; on Jersey Shore) and the fact that its reminiscent of Ronald Regan&#8217;s <a  href="http://youtu.be/EU-IBF8nwSY">&#8220;Its Morning Again in America&#8221;</a>, see if you Eagle-Eyed Filmmaker IQ followers can spot it in Newt&#8217;s ad:</p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="341" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/k9TVrLTObmg?hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right, there it is at 0:04.</p>
<p><img src="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/American_Afternoon-600x362.jpg" alt="" title="American_Afternoon" width="600" height="362" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-10244" /></p>
<p>I also featured the exact same clip in the video review:</p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="341" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dkj5kjdQvpo?hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Here is the classic Ronald Reagan TV Ad: &#8220;Its Morning in America&#8221; from 1984.</p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="445" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EU-IBF8nwSY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>Now unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your political stance), my small contribution to Newt&#8217;s Campaign has not had a positive effect. Since posting the ad on December 5th, Newt&#8217;s numbers have been steadily declining&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Gingrich-Numbers.gif" alt="" title="Gingrich Numbers" width="572" height="365" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-10256" /></p>
<p>Perhaps it was because like Newt&#8217;s smile that white picket fence is made out of plastic.</p>
<p>Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond dared ask in <a  href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69766.html#ixzz1i0Ezv0Zk">this article</a>: “Can you identify all the Iowa landmarks?”</p>
<p>Well Mr. Hammond, the location is <a  href="http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Residents/ParksFacilities/Parks/HarvestonLakePark.htm">Harveston</a>, a man-made lake just under 5 years old in the City of Temecula, CA. The flag from the stock shot is down and winter has stripped the trees of their former lusciousness.</p>
<p>Here is a quick image of myself in the historic spot captured from an iPad. I rushed out to grab this before the sun went down and I left the CF card for my DSLR at home.</p>
<p><img src="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Photo-Dec-29-4-58-45-PM-600x450.jpg" alt="" title="Photo Dec 29, 4 58 45 PM" width="600" height="450" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-10248" /></p>
<h3>How did a clip from a camera review end up in a highly contested Republican Primary?</h3>
<p>Well being a starving filmmaker with a healthy appetite, I recycled that footage to microstock website iStockphoto.com &#8211; selling it for anyone to <a  href="http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-video-12862761-american-afternoon.php">purchase and download</a>. (Hint, you should purchase and download as well)</p>
<p>In the year and a half it&#8217;s been there the file has done very well. It was nominated and placed in their premiere Vetta Category (translation: Most Expensive) and has brought in about $700 in Royalties.</p>
<p>iStockphoto doesn&#8217;t show you who purchased the file, only when, so I&#8217;m forced to guess the agency that created the ad purchased it on October 14th, 2011 for which I received a handsome royalty of $64.40.</p>
<p>From a quick shot grabbed with an unfamiliar camera to a brief 2 second highlight in a national political campaign, this little clip has sparked considerable internet commentary.</p>
<p>It was first brought to my attention while browsing <a  href="http://www.cracked.com/article_19583_the-6-weirdest-things-that-are-ruining-your-memory.html">Cracked.com in an attempt to avoid doing anything productive when I saw this</a>:<br />
<img src="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Cracked-600x935.jpg" alt="" title="Cracked" width="600" height="935" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-10252" /></p>
<h3>Some more on what the media is saying about the ad.</h3>
<blockquote><p>The ad begins, almost David Lynch-like, with scenes of small-town America, panning in slow motion at times, most effectively, when a large hand is shown in close-up gently sweeping over a wheat field, suggesting a wise farmer &#8212; or perhaps the hand of the Almighty himself? &#8212; tending to his precious crop. You may not realize it when you watch this unusually evocative image &#8212; one of several in the ad &#8212; but that&#8217;s very likely Newt&#8217;s own hand on camera, and the wind-blown golden harvest beneath it is the proverbial &#8220;amber wave of grain&#8221; meant to symbolize the resurgence of the American heartland, overseen, of course, by the very white-haired shepherd who once angrily shut the entire federal government down.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stewart-j-lawrence/newt-gingrich-iowa_b_1130817.html">Huffington Post</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s an upbeat spot themed on a slice of Americana — some of the shots are reminiscent of the movie &#8220;Armageddon&#8221;<br />
<strong><br />
<a  href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69766.html">Politico</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Some people say the America we know and love is a thing of the past. I don’t believe that because working together I know we can rebuild America,” Gingrich says in the ad, over video of a landscape and the American flag hanging from a front porch, blowing in the wind.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2Fblogs%2Fpolitics%2F2011%2F12%2Fnewt-gingrich-to-air-first-tv-ad-in-iowa%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNF1zpVa4ZXYA3empxz5StOopTR5DA">ABC News</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The campaign confirms to CNN that it will spend $250,000 to run the spot state-wide in Iowa, which holds the first contest in the presidential caucus and primary calendar.<br />
<strong><br />
<a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fpoliticalticker.blogs.cnn.com%2F2011%2F12%2F05%2Fgingrich-goes-up-with-first-spot-of-presidential-campaign%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNGJ3bjoaeyLnql1dW_E3uCyeNJi2w">CNN</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>His one-minute commercial will be seen on cable and broadcast networks in Iowa, said a campaign spokesman, R.C. Hammond. The upbeat and positive ad features strong patriotic themes, with Mr. Gingrich speaking directly into the camera.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fthecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com%2F2011%2F12%2F05%2Fgingrich-to-roll-out-first-ads-on-monday%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNGG9UtiUcZzVhQ8U33i0AOREQ80Hg">New York Times</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Newt Gingrich began this week by releasing a minute-long campaign ad titled “Rebuilding the America We Love,” in which the veteran Republican insists that the wholesome, idyllic, small-town America that we all recognize from movies and advertising still exists. The ad is not terribly convincing, partly because it’s a rather uninspired retread of Ronald Reagan’s famous “Morning in America” spot from 1984, and partly because, while Reagan was talking up the good times, Gingrich is talking down the bad.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fblogs%2Fbrowbeat%2F2011%2F12%2F07%2Fnewt_gingrich_should_emulate_ron_swanson.html&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNF8lZhqKOvKaXVTXkJYU-7MPrnpCQ">Slate</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Newt Gingrich has a new ad up, and it&#8217;s clear what he&#8217;s trying to do. He&#8217;s trying to get elected as Richard Milhous Reagan.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.esquire.com%2Fblogs%2Fpolitics%2Fnewt-gingrich-iowa-ad-6610653&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNH7KNK4t-x-W5QG8bwnYhd2wo_oTQ">Esquire</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Gingrich’s ad feels eerily similar to “Morning in America,” the iconic ad President Ronald Reagan aired in his 1984 reelection campaign. Set to an almost identical soft soundtrack, it blends footage of a suburban porch and humming factory, a mountain sunrise and main-street flower shop, as well as a couple of quintessential Iowa scenes: the State House in Des Moines and fields of grain.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fblogs%2Felection-2012%2Fpost%2Fgingrichs-first-tv-ad-rebuild-the-america-we-love%2F2011%2F12%2F05%2FgIQAfzQlUO_blog.html&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNFpUjFEiEALCk_qp1OsB_LYwjP-SA">Washington Post</a></strong>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>He delivers his rosy message over images literally lifted from &#8220;America the Beautiful&#8221; &#8212; predawn scenes of &#8220;amber waves of grain&#8221; and &#8220;purple mountains majesties.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theatlanticwire.com%2Fpolitics%2F2011%2F12%2Fits-morning-america-newts-new-iowa-ad%2F45727%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNHS0a5Fw-58nWI97OeCn9eTVIC1rA">The Atlantic</a></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The spot is being supported by a near Tiffany-esque $250,000 ad buy in Iowa.<br />
<strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fnewt-gingrich-releases-first-tv-ad-on-the-america-we-love%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNHkwlliP03cp1ScSRSjHeoK5Vv12A">Mediaite</a></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The ad itself is well-produced, and captures some of that elusive Reaganian “Morning in America” quality, very obviously the intent of his campaign team.</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fhotair.com%2Farchives%2F2011%2F12%2F05%2Fvideo-newts-first-tv-spot-in-iowa%2F&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNGEvGjK7kIAT6jcgbt2t9-2yBJIPw">Hot Air</a></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote><p>It sounds like Newt is promising “Morning in America” again</p>
<p><strong><a  href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationalreview.com%2Fcampaign-spot%2F284865%2Fnewt-america-we-know-and-love-can-be-rebuilt&#038;sa=D&#038;sntz=1&#038;usg=AFQjCNFLJ9LSUmqoc44l7BxknPcV5-GaBA">National Review<br />
</a></strong></p></blockquote>
<h3>Where this starts to get weird.</h3>
<p>They say imitation is the greatest flattery, but I don&#8217;t think that is what these parody and remix creators where thinking. I guess they each owe me $64 now. Oh well, it&#8217;s the Holidays I guess I won&#8217;t sue. Plus that last guy scares the shit out of me.</p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="341" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8ZvNVzUINVg?hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="341" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zli4hKvix4I?hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="445" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zy_NbXjZHdg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </p>
<p>Parodies aside, it&#8217;s a good thing Newt paid me that $64 and didn&#8217;t steal that stock video. Not only because now I can afford healthcare. But because&#8230; Don&#8217;t Cross Us. Ever. Seriously. Just Don&#8217;t. </p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/15289798?byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="612" height="345" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/12/helping-newt-rebuild-the-america-we-love-for-only-64/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Past 15 Years of Indie Film Distribution</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/11/past-15-years-of-indie-film-distribution/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/11/past-15-years-of-indie-film-distribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=9610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the Elinor Bunin Munroe Film Center indieWIRE Editor in Chief Dana Harris moderates a discussion about the past 15 years of film distribution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the <a  href="http://www.filmlinc.com/about/the-elinor-bunin-munroe-film-center">Elinor Bunin Munroe Film Center</a> <a  href="http://www.indiewire.com/">indieWIRE</a> Editor in Chief Dana Harris moderates a discussion about the past 15 years of film distribution with (left to right): Richard Abramowitz, Amy Heller, Bingham Ray, Bob Berney, Ira Deutchman, Mark Urman, Arianna Bocco and Jeanne Berney.</p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="341" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZHYqPt1KKOM?hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/11/past-15-years-of-indie-film-distribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Make a Living as a Filmmaker</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/07/how-to-make-a-living-as-a-filmmaker/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/07/how-to-make-a-living-as-a-filmmaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=7885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This event was co-sponsored by the Tribeca Film Institute and the Department of Media Studies and Film at The New School.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This event was co-sponsored by the <a  href="http://www.tribecafilminstitute.org/">Tribeca Film Institute</a> and the Department of Media Studies and Film at <a  href="http://www.newschool.edu/">The New School</a>.</p>
<p><iframe width="612" height="378" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Nl3V3CsTJPE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/07/how-to-make-a-living-as-a-filmmaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Creativity, Cash and Tools: The Making of an Indie Film</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/07/creativity-cash-and-tools-the-making-of-an-indie-film/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/07/creativity-cash-and-tools-the-making-of-an-indie-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filmmakeing 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre-production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=7851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Award winning filmmakers explore their path to festival fame as they illuminate the creative and pragmatic execution of their vision. How did they develop their story, find their funding, and what were creative tools that made their story come to life. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Award winning filmmakers explore their path to festival fame as they illuminate the creative and pragmatic execution of their vision. How did they develop their story, find their funding, and what were creative tools that made their story come to life. </p>
<p><a  href="http://createasphere.com/En/panels/item/15-creativity-cash-and-tools-the-making-of-an-indie-film.html">Watch the rest of the panel here.</a></p>
<p>VIA: <a  href="http://vimeo.com/createasphere">Createasphere</a></p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/25727372?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="612" height="344" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/07/creativity-cash-and-tools-the-making-of-an-indie-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The A-Z of Excellent Copywriting</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/05/the-a-z-of-excellent-copywriting/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/05/the-a-z-of-excellent-copywriting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 07:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John P. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IndieGoGo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kickstart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling you Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=6673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In advertising world, the content of an ad is called "copy". Being as filmmaking is such a collaborative medium, you will often be called to write some sort of pitch to "sell" your ideas and yourself. Here are 26 tips (alphabetically, including links to more in-depth articles) for better copy writing that you should reference to make your next pitch sizzle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In advertising world, the content of an ad is called &#8220;copy&#8221;. Being as filmmaking is such a collaborative medium, you will often be called to write some sort of pitch to &#8220;sell&#8221; your ideas and yourself. Here are 26 tips (alphabetically, including links to more in-depth articles) for better copy writing that you should reference to make your next pitch sizzle.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a  href="http://www.copyblogger.com/copywriting-a-to-z/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Copyblogger+%28Copyblogger%29">&#8230;<strong>Action</strong></p>
<p>The whole point of copywriting is to get the reader to take action.<br />
You want them to buy your product, subscribe to your RSS feed, join your email list, or just spread the word. Before you write your next piece, decide what you want your reader to do.</p>
<p><strong>Brevity</strong></p>
<p>Cut unnecessary words.</a></p>
<p><strong>— CopyBlogger.com | <a  href="http://www.copyblogger.com/copywriting-a-to-z/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Copyblogger+%28Copyblogger%29">Read The Full Article</a></strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/05/the-a-z-of-excellent-copywriting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspectives on the Film Business from Ted Hope the producer of &#8220;Adventureland&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/04/perspectives-on-the-film-business-from-ted-hope-the-producer-of-adventureland/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/04/perspectives-on-the-film-business-from-ted-hope-the-producer-of-adventureland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John P. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Filmmaking 360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Newman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vimeo Festival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=6547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0394046/">Ted Hope (Adventureland, American Splendor)</a> and Brian Newman discuss the nature of the film business from the perspective technology and trends in the industry in this talk from the Vimeo Festival.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a  href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0394046/">Ted Hope (Adventureland, American Splendor)</a> and Brian Newman discuss the nature of the film business from the perspective technology and trends in the industry in this talk from the Vimeo Festival.</p>
<p>Highlights:<br />
<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/18977184?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="612" height="344" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<p>Full Talk:<br />
<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/18977556?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="612" height="344" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/04/perspectives-on-the-film-business-from-ted-hope-the-producer-of-adventureland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What kind of Deliverables do Distributors Expect?</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/04/what-kind-of-deliverables-do-distributors-expect/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/04/what-kind-of-deliverables-do-distributors-expect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John P. Hess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliverables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distributors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=6545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You've just done the impossible: You just sold your feature to a distributor... But what do they expect to get from you? Here's a few sample deliverables from distribution contracts for you to look through - even if you haven't shot your next indie smash hit, it's good to know what's coming down the plate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve just done the impossible: You just sold your feature to a distributor&#8230; But what do they expect to get from you? Here&#8217;s a few sample deliverables from distribution contracts for you to look through &#8211; even if you haven&#8217;t shot your next indie smash hit, it&#8217;s good to know what&#8217;s coming down the plate.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a  href="http://www.shericandler.com/2011/04/15/pmds-should-know-deliverables/">&#8230;Initial Delivery Items<br />
A.            PUBLICITY MATERIAL<br />
1.            Key Art – Physical delivery of key art in fully layered photoshop files on CD.<br />
2.            Advertising/Publicity Material – All publicity which may have been prepared in connection with the Picture, but not less than one complete set of all advertising materials available, including, without limitation, press books, posters and publicity material.  In addition, a written report of all additional photography in existence, including, without limitation, special shoots, photo agency art, etc. These materials may be delivered on CD or DVD.</a></p>
<p><strong>— Sheri Candler.com| <a  href="http://www.shericandler.com/2011/04/15/pmds-should-know-deliverables/">Read The Full Article</a></strong></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2011/04/what-kind-of-deliverables-do-distributors-expect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fans, Friends &amp; Followers: Creating Your Own Cult</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/09/fans-friends-followers-creating-your-own-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/09/fans-friends-followers-creating-your-own-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Script]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=3575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From SXSW 2010: Finding an audience has become essential to the filmmaker's arsenal. Featuring real-world examples, Gary Hustwit (director: Objectified, Helvetica) and Scott Kirsner (CinemaTech) explore the filmmaker's art of cultivating an audience for their work, spreading the word, showing up for screenings, and buying the DVDs or downloading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a  href="http://sxsw.com/">SXSW</a> 2010: Finding an audience has become essential to the filmmaker&#8217;s arsenal. Featuring real-world examples, Gary Hustwit (director: <a  href="http://www.objectifiedfilm.com/">Objectified, Helvetica</a>) and Scott Kirsner (<a  href="http://cinematech.blogspot.com/">CinemaTech</a>) explore the filmmaker&#8217;s art of cultivating an audience for their work, spreading the word, showing up for screenings, and buying the DVDs or downloading.</p>
<p>VIA: <a  href="http://www.youtube.com/user/sxsw">SXSW</a></p>
<p><object width="612" height="369"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ORtktOyLvsY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ORtktOyLvsY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="612" height="369"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/09/fans-friends-followers-creating-your-own-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Truth On How Hollywood Makes Money: Can Indies Films Survive?</title>
		<link>http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/09/the-truth-on-how-hollywood-makes-money-can-indies-films-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/09/the-truth-on-how-hollywood-makes-money-can-indies-films-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling Your Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre-production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmmakeriq.com/?p=3504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The once promising indie film industry has all but disappeared from Hollywood in recent years. Author Edward Jay Epstein explores the complicated finances behind why Hollywood is abandoning the indie films in favor of big budget spectacles like Avatar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The once promising indie film industry has all but disappeared from Hollywood in recent years. Author Edward Jay Epstein explores the complicated finances behind why Hollywood is abandoning the indie films in favor of big budget spectacles like Avatar.</p>
<p>Edward Jay Epstein is author of <strong><a  href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933633840?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=rxneto-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=1933633840">The Hollywood Economist: The Hidden Financial Reality Behind the Movies</a></strong> you can also see Epstein in Oliver Stone’s forthcoming <a  href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1027718/">Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps</a> wherein Epstein plays the head of the Fed.</p>
<p><embed src="http://www.npr.org/v2/?i=124535538&#38;m=125454542&#38;t=audio" height="386" wmode="opaque" allowfullscreen="true" width="400" base="http://www.npr.org" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></p>
<p>Edward Jay Epstein talks with Bloomberg’s Betty Liu about the role of film libraries in the financial health of movie studios and the outlook for independent filmmakers.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/14724985?byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="612" height="459" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<h3>Excerpt: &#8216;<a  href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933633840?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=rxneto-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=1933633840">The Hollywood Economist</a>&#8216;</h3>
<h2>The Hollywood Economist: Can Indie Movies Be Saved?</h2>
<p><strong>by EDWARD JAY EPSTEIN</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><a  href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1933633840?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=rxneto-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=1933633840" 0="/"><img src="http://filmmakeriq.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/hollywoodeconomist-220x300.jpg" alt="" title="The Hollywood Economist: The Hidden Financial Reality Behind the Movies" width="220" height="300" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3519" /></a><a  href="http://mhpbooks.com/mobylives/?p=11821">The Achilles’ heel of the independent movie business is American distribution. No matter how brilliant an indie movie may be, and no matter how many awards its wins at film festivals, it needs to get into theaters to be seen. That feat is no longer easy for an indie movie.</p>
<p>The Big Six six studios–Disney, Paramount, Universal, Warner Brothers, Fox, and Sony–are also distribution juggernauts. They dominate both American and foreign distribution . Each of them employs a small army of salesmen, publicists, media buyers, theater-relations liaisons, merchandising specialists, and lawyers to get its movies and coming attractions on the best screens in theaters, its stars on the top TV shows, and its DVDs in the prime space at video stores. Because of their enormous clout with theater chains, the Big Six can open their movies on 4,000 screens in the US and thousands of additional screens overseas. They also have long-standing merchandising deals with fast-food chains, toy companies, and other mass retailers to assist these global openings. Since their distribution machines have enormous overhead, the Big Six studios need to confine their releases to potentially huge grossing movies. The size of the gross is crucial–even if there is no net profit–because studios, take a hefty cut of it off the top in the form of a distribution fee (typically, on movies that studios finance, it is 30 percent) which helps offset the overhead. The requisite, however, often leaves producers of smaller films out in the cold. Consider, for example, the sad story told to me by one of the most successful indie producer. In 2009, he brought to a major studio a project that had a budget of a mere $20 million with a well-regarded director and stars. After running the numbers, the studio estimated that its potential box-office was $100 million, which would yield it, just from the distribution fee and the output deal with HBO, a 100 percent profit on its investment. Yet, it flatly turned down the project because, as its executive told the producer, “We don’t do films that do not have a projected box-office of at least $150 million.” The reason is that each studio has only a limited number of slots for their releases, and they have to fill them with so-called “high value” films with a potential to generating hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue to pay their overhead. Indie films, even if they return a profitable on a relatively small investment, cannot be counted on to do that job.</p>
<p>So how does an indie producer get an American distributor?</a></p>
<p><a  href="http://mhpbooks.com/mobylives/?p=11821"><strong>- Edward Jay Epstein | Read the Full Article</strong></a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://filmmakeriq.com/2010/09/the-truth-on-how-hollywood-makes-money-can-indies-films-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

